I was at my cousin’s
wedding, which was lovely, and the service was lead by a monsignor, a guy above
bishops. He was conversational and Herman Melville turned up in his sermon. I’d
just read In The Heart of The Sea, a
book based on the boat-staving sperm whale who inspired Meville’s Moby Dick, so I thought yes, Melville,
you’ve got me, Father. Now what about the novelist?
Mostly what I’m thinking
about is that it would be hard to write so many sermons.
At this wedding in LA, my
friend Danichi wedding, which was also beautiful, but the priest, a young guy, not
catholic, so I guess he would not be a priest, he talked about Kierkegaard. And
quoted him. In his service before the vows. Very bad. So many hip philosophers to choose from when speaking about love. Why that one.
I’ll admit that I was dehydrated
at this time from a late night. And I also had food poisoning from a vegan
restaurant in Silver Lake that Munchie chose for us to eat at for brunch. And
the day before, in a bathroom of a San Francisco Starbucks (serves me right) my
glasses fell into the urinal while I was peeing, and suddenly I was peeing all
over my glasses, and urinal water, my glasses sat in urinal water. And I kid
you not, I had fleas. Or maybe bedbugs, from the Fisherman’s Wharf Hostel. I
wrapped my clothes in trash bags and dumped those bags in a public trash can.
So, bitten, blind, nauseous,
and headached, and very, very ashamed, I can’t remember the quote, but the
important thing to know is this—that Kierkegaard was a miserable creature who
hounded his intended fiancée, and after begging her for marriage, he backed out
of the deal so that he could, I don't know, be, what, severe and anxious? Which
is his right. But really, what I’m wondering is, what a brave and worldly, or
not even worldly but practical
monsignor to use the skeptic Herman Melville, and what a poor move to use that emo
Dane.
What was the Melville quote?
I thought I’d never find it. I knew I wanted to look it up but I thought, nope,
that thing is gone. Turns out it’s everywhere:
“We cannot live only for ourselves. A
thousand fibers connect us with our fellow men; and among those fibers, as
sympathetic threads, our actions run as causes, and they come back to us as
effects.”
The context was, it’s OK not to be a good Catholic, and get
this, the guy actually said it, it’s OK not even to be Catholic, just so long
as you are decent to people. I wanted to cry if that were the kind of thing I
could do. I’d been waiting to hear that for years. This is the closest I’d come
to God in decades. How can he say such good things? Probably this guy is an
atheist who knows he has a fun job, I thought.
But to the literature point, it sounds like Melville—“A thousand
fibers…
among those fibers, as sympathetic threads, our actions
run
as
causes”
a third of Moby Dick is just wild
flashes of rhetoric and cadence. Can you read scansion? I bet that line has some meter.
But then I read this blog, melvilliana.blogspot.com, and they found that above quote in a sermon by Henry Melville (no relation?) a British preacher, 1855. Herman the Novelist was alive then, had just finished his whale book a few years prior. How about that. And what does it all mean, and etc.
But then I read this blog, melvilliana.blogspot.com, and they found that above quote in a sermon by Henry Melville (no relation?) a British preacher, 1855. Herman the Novelist was alive then, had just finished his whale book a few years prior. How about that. And what does it all mean, and etc.
I don’t like Moby Dick
as much as I used to. So many encyclopedia chapters where the author tries to
prove to you that he’s smart and knows his shit. All this is because critics
made fun of his early books—Omoo, Typee, Mardi, Red Burn, White Jacket—said that he made it all up, and knew
nothing of Fiji and these other, to New England, uncivilized communities where
people were always doing it and having a good guilt free time. Although he
published these books as novels, I’m not sure what genre expectations were at
the time, but they came off as too outrageous for most.
So I’ve just been skipping those encyclopedic I-will-prove-it! chapters.
I write “Herman, no!” under those chapter titles. Why I still read it, aside
from my love for setting and novels set in small spaces is how Ishmael,
although he does not really believe, still challenges himself to. Either
because he is lonely, worried, or because (not or, but and) he realizes that
there is some value in the practice of belief. Or that haters are often coming
from a place of wanting to believe.
Now, I am not that person, but I do like reading a book about
that person. And I also like that London preacher Henry Melville’s quotation
got misattributed to a spiritual mess of a guy like Herman Melville, whose now
classic novel was almost unanimously hated in his lifetime and earned him no
money in large part to his narrator’s endless knocks against his Protestant
countrymen and his embrace of taking transcendence where he could get it.
No comments:
Post a Comment